Let’s break this one down into two parts:
1 – Are we receiving the right information?
Here we need to apply the who, what, when, where, how and why hierarchy.
When handling information about risks, hazards and incidents, who informs you? And who do you tell? This will depend on your role, what happened, and who is impacted. It’s imperative your team knows when to pass information onto you, and you know when to escalate it further. For example, let’s look at these two incidents:
Incident 1: Adam is opening a box and gets a cardboard cut on his finger. He needs first aid, so he informs his supervisor and heads to the medical room for treatment. He returns to work later that day.
Incident 2: Paul is de-rigging a load and the load falls. Paul tries to grab the load to prevent it from falling and cuts his finger. He needs first aid so he informs his supervisor and heads to the medical room for treatment. He also returns to work later that day.
Although both incidents resulted in cut fingers, Paul’s had the potential to lead to permanent injury or death. His incident would need to be investigated to ensure it doesn’t happen again, and the company directors would need to be informed. If this information wasn’t escalated beyond a medical report, a fatality could occur.
However, Adam’s incident had reached its maximum potential because it’s awfully unlikely the cardboard box could cause further injury or death. So a simple medical report suffices for Adam, and it’s unlikely the company directors would be notified.
2 – How are we actioning that information to control the situation?
When information is being passed up the chain, how is it being dealt with? Can we put new controls in place? Do we need to update procedures or undergo training?
This will vary case-by-case. In the scenario above, this would take the form of an incident management process, which is the why.